chlorine free red flare/star

All Recipes and Chemistry!

Moderators: richardh08, Boophoenix, Lloyd

Post Reply
dave321
Posts: 394
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2015 11:53 pm

chlorine free red flare/star

Post by dave321 »

attached an interesting paper using amongst other alternatives, hexamine for a red flare/star
with no chlorine donor.
sabatini2015.pdf
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Lloyd
Posts: 1908
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 1:43 am

Re: chlorine free red flare/star

Post by Lloyd »

Red is one color that requires no chlorine donor. Consider common road flares.

Lloyd
"Pyro for Fun and Profit for More Than Sixty Years"
User avatar
richardh08
Site Admin
Posts: 2229
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 1:54 pm
Location: Bedfordshire

Re: chlorine free red flare/star

Post by richardh08 »

I had always been led to understand (mainly by the many articles on the topic by the Kosankes) that the orange-red colour of a chlorine-free Sr-based composition was caused by emission from SrOH. However, this article says that the real culprit is SrO emission.

I took another look at Chapter 9 (by the Kosankes) of Pyrotechnic Chemistry. Table 12, a list of 'undesirable species', clearly states that SrOH emission is reddish orange (and that of SrO is 'orange'). In contrast, the earlier Table 9 shows that the strongest emission from SrOH is at a wavelength 682 nm, which is a slightly deeper red than that of the strongest emission of SrCl, at 674 nm (SrO isn't mentioned).

On the whole, I'm more inclined to believe Sabatini et al.
Even when I'm wrong, I'm convincing.
Pyro
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri May 03, 2019 5:25 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: chlorine free red flare/star

Post by Pyro »

The strontium monohydroxide emission gives ok red but not the blood red colour you can get from the more pure SrCl* emission and I guess it was from that perspective the Kosanke's were talking about what emitting species were undesirable or not.

For the military, and also for marine signaling flares, the red colour does not have to be very pure to be approved but it would not look good in fireworks unless that particular hue is wanted for a certain effect or combination of colours.

We have experimented a lot with improving the luminosity and colour of high magnesium content red flares and it is amazing how little chlorine donor is needed for an acceptable red colour if you just add a secondary fuel that can provide what is needed for both SrOH* and SrCl* emission. Hexamine works but guanidinium nitrate is much better.
dave321
Posts: 394
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2015 11:53 pm

Re: chlorine free red flare/star

Post by dave321 »

i am assuming that the hexamine or guanidine nitrate, as well as being gas producers
and because of that also increase the flame envelope, which helps with the colour
Pyro
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri May 03, 2019 5:25 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: chlorine free red flare/star

Post by Pyro »

Yes they expand the flame and provide water vapor that is needed to create the monohydroxide.
Post Reply